CHURCH WORLDWIDE: At Makeshift Graveyard on the National Mall, Clergy Demand Gun Control

Clergy from California to Connecticut created a makeshift graveyard symbolizing victims of gun violence on the National Mall on April 11 as they exhorted Congress to pass legislation to limit access to firearms.

Symbolic grave markers placed on the National Mall on April 11, 2013, as part of a 24-hour vigil held by religious leaders calling upon Congress to vote on legislation to prevent gun violence.

Standing in front of 3,300 grave markers representing the number of people who have died in gun violence since December’s massacre in Newtown, Conn., more than 25 ministers, rabbis, and other religious leaders decried as “idolatrous” a society that values guns more than human life.

“We don’t have a Second Amendment issue,” said Rev. Matt Crebbin of Newtown Congregational Church. “We have a Second Commandment crisis.

“The near infatuation with the gun is moving dangerously close to becoming a full-blown worship of a false idol,” continued Crebbin, who in December presided over a nationally televised memorial service for Newtown victims.

Other clergy, speaking to a crowd of mostly reporters, picked up on the idolatry theme. They singled out for particular blame those lawmakers who take gun lobby money and ignore the national will. Polls show that most Americans support universal background checks and tighter gun control.

“The nation is so far ahead of where our political leaders are,” said Rev. Jim Wallis, president of Sojourners, a liberal Christian group that organized the grave markers project and a 24-hour vigil on the National Mall. “Our political leaders need to catch up.”

Most of the grave markers were wooden crosses, but some were placards printed with the symbols of other religious traditions—Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, and Sikhism. Each represents a life taken, said Rabbi David Saperstein, director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism.

“Every one of those religious symbols represents one of God’s children,” he said. “See the one there? That’s a mother who won’t be there to comfort her child the next time they’re sick.”

Emotions ran high among the clergy. Rev. Sam Saylor of Blackwell Memorial AME Zion Church in Hartford, Conn., broke down in wails and fell into the arms of his fellow pastors after he spoke about Newtown and his son, Shane Oliver, who was 20 when he was gunned down last year.

Since Oliver’s death, life will never be the same for his family, just as, since Newtown, life will never be the same for the country, Saylor said.

“We can’t ever go back home again,” he said. “Business in Washington can never be the same again. We can never take life for granted again.”

It is unclear whether members of Congress feel the same way. Even supporters of the background-check bill introduced in the Senate acknowledge that it faces hurdles. And opposition looms even larger for other gun control measures, including an assault weapons ban and limits on high-capacity magazines.

One passerby shouted at the clergy, as a closing prayer was offered, that people have a better chance of going to jail than getting shot.

But most tourists strolling by the gathering seemed sympathetic to the clergy’s cause.

“It’s silly that the American people so overwhelmingly want something to happen, and Congress refuses to act on it,” said Tim Keene of North Yarmouth, Maine.

About the Author

Religion News Service is an independent, nonprofit and award-winning source of global news on religion, spirituality, culture and ethics.

See comments (1)

Comments

1. It is by no means clear that the majority of citizens desire gun control to the taste of these clergy.

2. Christianity is not an essentially pacifist religion.  Gun control of the sort offered by Congress is a prudential question, not a theological one.  The attempt to use their status as clergy to impose a prudential political position on the faithful (as well as the country) is to abuse their office.

3. It is quite clear, and even admitted by the sponsors of the legislation put forward in the senate, that nothing in it would prevent the deaths these clergy are using as a prop for their political position.  Using these deaths, then, to advocate for it is more than a little dishonest.

4. By focusing on the tools people use to perpetrate evil, rather than the heart from which that evil springs, these clergy fail in their task, which is to call all to holy living in righteousness before God, to repentance and faith.  It is akin to demanding Federal tongue control because so many use theirs for evil purposes. Then again, perhaps they'd like that, too.  I know at least some politicians are as eager to undermine the first as they are the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

5. We might ask - although it is admittedly difficult to ascertain - how many lives continue because someone has a gun with which to defend those lives.  It's hard to know what crimes and assaults don't happen because the criminals fear someone else also has a gun, but it is greater than zero.

To sum up, it seems so simple, until one actually begins to think about it.

X